Skip to content

Final Summary and Suggestions:

Examined a multitude of scholarly texts, including books, academic journal articles, periodicals, encyclopedias, legal records, and past charters.

Summary of Final Remarks and Suggestions:
Summary of Final Remarks and Suggestions:

A Fresh Perspective on the Right to Revolution

Final Summary and Suggestions:

This project dives into the contentious topic of revolution, focusing on the right of the people to overthrow an unjust government that infringes on their inherent rights. The study takes a contemporary look at this issues, using Fichtean political philosophy to provide a compelling argument.

Struggling with Your Dissertation? We've Got You Covered! Our elite team of writers can assist you with your research, writing, and editing needs. Reach out today for top-notch, timely help!

First, we delve into the concept of human rights, tracing their historical origins from the Middle Ages to the modern era, with a particular focus on the influential Enlightenment period. Following this overview, we examine the principles of human rights and provide an historical account of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 (UDHR). Subsequently, we place this discussion within the context of modern human governance.

With regards to the right to revolution, our investigation consolidates different scholarly viewpoints into a cohesive argument through incorporating Fichtean political philosophy. This involves critically evaluating Fichte's political philosophy, examining the historical context in which he philosophized, and critiquing his perspectives on state, society, and natural human rights. Additionally, we investigate the role Fichte played in defending the French Revolution. To make his philosophy relevant to today, we also critique it using the theory of Postmodernism. The goal is to determine if his political philosophy remains applicable to the world's present-day political issues.

Using this framework, we examine three major historical revolutions: the English Revolution (1640), the French Revolution (1789-1799), the Russian Revolution (1917-1923), and the Nigerian-Biafran Revolution (1967-1970). By analyzing these events, we aim to identify any shifts in political thought and demonstrate the legality of revolution through the lens of both Fichte's political philosophy and international law.

Key Insights

  1. Fichte articulated the concept of self-consciousness and mutual recognition as the foundation of political subjectivity and legitimacy. His philosophy is based on the idea of the "absolute I," which is self-creating and self-determining, resulting in individual and collective freedom arising from self-limitations that allow for mutual recognition with others.
  2. Revolutions, in Fichte's view, may become legally justifiable if they reflect the collective assertion of a people's self-determination and self-consciousness. Political action tied to national character and autonomy plays a significant role, as observed in his work The Closed Commercial State (1800), which advocated national self-sufficiency (autarky) to maintain peace and national honor.
  3. The international human rights framework recognizes the right of peoples to self-determination and the right to resist oppression or colonial domination as a justifiable cause for revolutionary action. However, modern international law typically requires revolutions to adhere to principles of justice, human dignity, and strive for sustainable peace and justice.
  4. Fichte's political philosophy justifies revolutions when they express the collective will of a people to assert their freedom and national identity, especially when existing governments obstruct autonomy or subject people to external control or economic dependence. This sentiment aligns with the international human rights principle of the right to self-determination and liberation from oppressive regimes.
  5. Fichte's rigorous nationalism, emphasizing a closed state and national character, can sometimes conflict with universal human rights norms if it leads to exclusion or suppression of minorities. Therefore, the justification is contingent on balancing national self-determination with respect for universal human rights.

In essence, this study demonstrates that major historical revolutions are legally justifiable when they enact the collective self-determination and moral autonomy of a people to establish an independent and self-sustaining political community. This position finds resonance in the international human rights framework under the right of peoples to self-determination, conditioned by the necessity of adhering to higher principles of justice and human dignity.

In the realm of education-and-self-development, dissertation writing services can be a valuable resource for students grappling with complex topics such as this investigation of revolution, offering assistance in research, writing, and editing to ensure quality work. Online-education platforms could also benefit from incorporating discussions on the connection between disruption (like revolutions) and learning, as understanding historical revolutions provides a deeper context for contemporary issues and fosters critical thinking skills. That being said, learning about the right to revolution through scholarly dissertations not only increases one's own knowledge but also contributes to the collective understanding of political subjectivity and legitimacy in the realm of education-and-self-development.

Read also:

    Latest