Skip to content

Scholars and Educators File Lawsuit against Trump Administration over Prohibition of "Racially-Based" Methods

Universities face legal action over Trump administration's directive to eradicate all "race-based" university practices within fortnight, as educators and academics assert in their lawsuit.

Professionals in education and academia have initiated a legal action against the Trump...
Professionals in education and academia have initiated a legal action against the Trump administration's instructions, urging universities to abolish any "race-based" practices within a fortnight.

Scholars and Educators File Lawsuit against Trump Administration over Prohibition of "Racially-Based" Methods

Firing Back Against the White House: Educators Cry Foul on Diversity Restrictions

Take a stance, educators say: the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and the American Sociological Association (ASA) are standing up to the Trump administration's attempts to curb diversity and inclusion in education.

In response to the administration's efforts to eliminate race-based practices in higher education, these educational powerhouses have taken the White House to court. The lawsuit, filed Tuesday, claims the Department of Education's memo oversteps its legal boundaries, forcing schools to stick to government-sanctioned perspectives.

"The government has no right to dictate what we teach," casts a Nertzy, a history professor at the University of California, Berkeley, echoing the lawsuit's sentiments. "The Supreme Court has never banned diversity, equity, and inclusion, and we shouldn't be forced to water down our curriculums."

The lawsuit asserts that the administration's guidance violates the First and Fifth Amendments, as it seeks to restrict teaching about systemic racism and other essential aspects of U.S. history. For example, a history course exploring key events such as slavery, the Missouri Compromise, the Emancipation Proclamation, and the forced relocation of Native American tribes could become contentious under this new policy.

While the Department of Education has yet to respond to the lawsuit, the memo issued by Craig Trainor, the department's acting assistant secretary for civil rights, maintains that DEI efforts have been "smuggling racial stereotypes and explicit race-consciousness into everyday training, programming, and discipline."

The educators' lawsuit also raises concerns that the memo's overly broad language could lead to penalties for universities hosting voluntary student clubs, such as African-American student unions and Irish-American heritage clubs.

American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten calls the memo a "grave attack" on education, students, and teachers' freedom, claiming it would hinder efforts to promote access to education and equal opportunity for all.

Notable organizations like the AFT and ASA assert the importance of discussing race and racial relations in classrooms, as understanding these issues has always been vital to fostering a well-informed, culturally sensitive society. The ongoing legal dispute sheds light on the critical balance between promoting diversity and complying with federal guidelines in the realm of American education.

Sources

Educator coalition sues to block Trump anti-diversity orders: 'A grave attack'

Teachers union sues over Trump administration's deadline to end school diversity programs

Additional Insights

  • Legal Landscape: The lawsuit against the Trump administration builds upon other legal efforts challenging the administration's stance on race-based practices in education. Notable examples include the ongoing lawsuit against Harvard University, in which dozens of colleges support Harvard's claim that a funding freeze related to race-based practices impacts the broader future of American democracy [1][3].
  • Implications: The proposed restrictions on teaching race-based topics could significantly alter the academic environment, potentially watering down conversations about race and racial relations and focusing more on compliance with federal guidelines [4][5].
  • False Claims Act: The U.S. Department of Justice has initiated a Civil Rights Fraud Initiative under the False Claims Act, which targets colleges accused of violating civil rights, including claims related to race-based admissions and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs [2].
  • Title VI Investigations: The Department of Education has launched investigations into universities for alleged violations of Title VI, which prohibits race-based discrimination, focusing on DEI programs and the administration's argument that some practices are illegal [4][5].
  1. The American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and the American Sociological Association (ASA) are arguing that the administration's attempts to restrict diversity and inclusion in education, as outlined in the Department of Education's memo, infringe upon their civil rights and self-development by limiting discussion about race and racial relations in classrooms.
  2. In the realm of general news, a lawsuit filing by educators against the Trump administration has brought attention to the ongoing tension between promoting diversity and complying with federal guidelines in American education, with concerns raised that the administration's orders could affect student clubs focusing on race, such as African-American student unions and Irish-American heritage clubs.

Read also:

    Latest